This paper shows that supporters and critics often fail to recognise that they have been talking with different conceptions of the genuine link requirement in mind. It explores the normative arguments for predicating the boundaries of national membership on a genuine link requirement.
Read more here.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. More information
The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.
